Return on investment of fracture liaison services: a systematic review and analysis.

Fracture liaison services (FLS) have been proven clinically effective and cost-effective in preventing subsequent fractures among patients with an existing fragility fracture. Little is known about their monetary benefits such as their return on investment (ROI). This systematic review aimed to investigate the ROI of FLS and identify the FLS characteristics with better ROI. Studies on the cost-effectiveness of FLS published between January 2000 and December 2022 were searched from MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Central. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection and data extraction. ROI was calculated based on the difference between monetary benefits and FLS costs divided by the FLS costs. Subgroup analysis of ROI was performed across FLS types and FLS design details. A total of 23 FLS were included in this review. The majority of them were targeting patients aged over 50 years having fractures without identified sites. The mean ROI of these FLS was 10.49 (with a median ROI of 7.57), and 86.96% of FLS had positive ROI. FLS making treatment recommendations yielded the highest ROI (with a mean ROI of 18.39 and a median of 13.60). Incorporating primary care providers (with a mean ROI of 16.04 and a median of 13.20) or having them as program leaders (with a mean ROI of 12.07 and a median of 12.07) has demonstrated a high ROI. FLS for specific fracture sites had great monetary return. Intensive FLS such as type A and B FLS programs had higher ROI than non-intensive type C and D FLS. This review revealed a 10.49-fold monetary return of FLS. Identified characteristics contributing to greater economic return informed value-for-money FLS designs. Findings highlight the importance of FLS and the feasibility of expanding their contribution in mitigating the economic burden of osteoporotic fracture and are conducive to the promotion of FLS internationally.

Cerebrovascular autoregulation monitoring and patient-centred outcomes after cardiac surgery: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation (CVAR) is observed in up to 20% of cardiac surgical patients. This systematic review aims to evaluate the association between impaired CVAR, measured by current monitoring techniques, and patient-centred outcomes in adults following cardiac surgery. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE In-Process and Cochrane Library were systematically searched through 8 December 2017. Studies were included if they assessed associations between CVAR and patient-centred outcomes in the adult cardiac surgical population. The primary outcome of this systematic review was mortality. Secondary outcomes were stroke, delirium and acute kidney injury. Risk of bias was systematically assessed, and the GRADE methodology was used to evaluate the quality of evidence across outcomes. RESULTS: Eleven observational studies and no randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Due to methodological heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not possible. There was a high risk of bias within individual studies and low quality of evidence across outcomes. Of the included studies, one assessed mortality, five assessed stroke, four assessed delirium, and three assessed acute kidney injury. No reliable conclusions can be drawn from the one study assessing mortality. Interpretation of studies investigating CVAR and stroke, delirium and acute kidney injury was complicated by the lack of standardisation of monitoring techniques as well as varying definitions of impaired CVAR. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of high quality evidence for CVAR monitoring and its associations with outcome measures in post-cardiac surgical patients, highlighting the need for future studies.

Reliability of intra-abdominal pressure measurements using the modified Kron technique.

OBJECTIVES: Assessment of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and the likelihood of abdominal compartment syndrome using valid and reliable measures is an important tool in the assessment of critically ill patients. The current method of relying on a single IAP per measurement period to determine patient clinical status raises the question: is a single intermittent IAP measurement an accurate indicator of clinical status or should more than one measurement be taken per measurement period? METHODS: This study sought to assess the reliability of IAP measurements. Measurements were taken using the modified Kron technique. A total of two transvesical intra-abdominal pressure measurements were undertaken per patient using a standardized protocol. Recordings were taken at intervals of 5 minutes. RESULTS: The majority of participants (58%) were surgical patients. Thirty-two were males and the mean age was 58 years (SD: 16·7 years). The concordance correlation coefficient between the two measurements was 0·95. Both the scatter and Bland-Altman plots demonstrate that the comparisons of two measurements are highly reproducible. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that conducting two IAP measurements on single patient produce comparable results; therefore, there appears to be no advantage in doing two IAP measurements on a single patient. The measurement of an IAP requires the implementation of a standardized protocol and competent and credentialed assessors trained in the procedure.

Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks.

UNLABELLED: We have developed clinical nomograms for predicting 5-year and 10-year fracture risks for any elderly man or woman. The nomograms used age and information concerning fracture history, fall history, and BMD T-score or body weight. INTRODUCTION: Although many fracture risk factors have been identified, the translation of these risk factors into a prognostic model that can be used in primary care setting has not been well realized. The present study sought to develop a nomogram that incorporates non-invasive risk factors to predict 5-year and 10-year absolute fracture risks for an individual man and woman. METHODS: The Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study was designed as a community-based prospective study, with 1358 women and 858 men aged 60+ years as at 1989. Baseline measurements included femoral neck bone mineral density (FNBMD), prior fracture, a history of falls and body weight. Between 1989 and 2004, 426 women and 149 men had sustained a low-trauma fracture (not including morphometric vertebral fractures). Two prognostic models based on the Cox's proportional hazards analysis were considered: model I included age, BMD, prior fracture and falls; and model II included age, weight, prior fracture and fall. RESULTS: Analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) suggested that model I (AUC = 0.75 for both sexes) performed better than model II (AUC = 0.72 for women and 0.74 for men). Using the models' estimates, we constructed various nomograms for individualizing the risk of fracture for men and women. If the 5-year risk of 10% or greater is considered "high risk", then virtually all 80-year-old men with BMD T-scores < -1.0 or 80-year-old women with T-scores < -2.0 were predicted to be in the high risk group. A 60-year-old woman's risk was considered high risk only if her BMD T-scores < or = -2.5 and with a prior fracture; however, no 60-year-old men would be in the high risk regardless of their BMD and risk profile. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the assessment of fracture risk for an individual cannot be based on BMD alone, since there are clearly various combinations of factors that could substantially elevate an individual's risk of fracture. The nomograms presented here can be useful for individualizing the short- and intermediate-term risk of fracture and identifying high-risk individuals for intervention to reduce the burden of fracture in the general population.

Discordance of longitudinal changes in bone density between densitometers.

UNLABELLED: This study examined the concordance in BMD measurement and longitudinal change in BMD between the GE Lunar Prodigy and GE Lunar DPX. Even though a high concordance between the densitometers was observed on a single measurement occasion, a significant discordance in longitudinal changes in BMD was observed. INTRODUCTION: Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) technology plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The present study examined the concordance in BMD measurement and longitudinal change in BMD between GE Lunar Prodigy and DPX. METHODS: BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck was measured in 135 individuals (47 men and 88 women, mean age 73+/-9 years) using both GE Lunar DPX and Prodigy densitometers at baseline. In this group, 56 individuals (22 men and 34 women) had repeated BMD measurements using the DPX and Prodigy during a subsequent follow-up visit (average duration: 2.2 years). RESULTS: For a single BMD measurement, the coefficient of concordance between the Prodigy and DPX was greater than 0.98 at the lumbar spine and 0.96 at the femoral neck, with the slope of linear regression being approximately 1.0. During the period of follow-up, the lumbar spine BMD decreased by -0.5% (S.D. 1.8%) when measured by DPX, which was significantly different (p=0.002) from the change measured by Prodigy (mean change=0, S.D. 2.0%). However, there was no significant difference (p=0.95) in the rate of change in femoral neck BMD measured by DPX (mean=-1.6%, S.D.=2.9) and Prodigy (mean=-1%, S.D.=1.8%). The correlation in rates of BMD change between Prodigy and DPX was 0.63 at the lumbar spine and 0.52 at the femoral neck. Simulation analysis showed that the theoretical maximum correlation in rates of BMD change between Prodigy and DPX was 0.71. CONCLUSIONS: Despite both densitometers being highly concordant in a single BMD measurement, discordance in the assessment of BMD changes between the Prodigy and DPX densitometers was observed. These findings have implications regarding the assessment of response to therapy in a multi-centre setting when different densitometers are used.

Development of a nomogram for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women.

UNLABELLED: Until now there has been no published prognostic tool available for predicting of hip fracture to primary care settings. We have developed a nomogram for predicting the absolute risk of hip fracture for any individual by using clinical factors, including age, prior fracture and fall, in addition to BMD that was based on a 15-year follow-up cohort study. INTRODUCTION: Bone mineral density or clinical risk factors alone are useful but limited tools for the identification of individuals with high-risk of hip fracture. It is hypothesized that the combination of clinical risk factors and BMD can improve the accuracy of fracture prediction. This study was aimed at developing a nomogram which combines these factors for predicting 5-year and 10-year risk of hip fracture for an individual. METHODS: The study, designed as a epidemiologic, community-based prospective study, included 1,208 women and 740 men aged 60+ years with median duration of follow-up of 13 years (inter-quartile range, IQR: 6-14) for both women and men, yielding 10,523 and 7,586 person-years of observation, respectively. Main outcome measures were incidence of hip fractures and risk factors were femoral neck bone mineral density (FNBMD), prior fracture, history of fall, postural sway and quadriceps strength. Femoral neck BMD was measured by DXA (GE-LUNAR Corp, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). Cox's proportional hazards model was used to estimate the risk of fracture for individuals, and a nomogram was constructed for predicting hip fracture risk. RESULTS: Between 1989 and 2004, 127 individuals (96 women) sustained a hip fracture. Advancing age, low femoral neck BMD, prior fracture and history of falls were independent predictors of hip fracture. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model was 0.85 for both sexes. A nomogram was constructed for predicting hip fracture risk for an individual. Among those aged 75 or older with BMD T-scores < or = -2.5, the risk of hip fracture in men was comparable to or higher than in women; however, in younger age groups, the risk was higher in women than in men. CONCLUSION: The combination of BMD and non-invasive clinical risk factors in a nomogram could be useful for identifying high-risk individuals for intervention to reduce the risk of hip fracture.

Quality of life and coping behaviour in Type 1 diabetes mellitus: relationship with metabolic control.

Uncovering factors possibly leading to insufficient metabolic control in Type 1 diabetes, both on the part of the patient or the treating physician, is of considerable relevance. The present long-term study investigated the relevance of patient-related vs education-related factors for the success in achieving acceptable glycaemic control. Adolescents or young adults with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (n= 26, mean age= 22+/-2 yr, diabetes duration= 11+/-5 yr) were followed during 36+/-5 months. All patients were treated by the same diabetologist. At the beginning of the study coping behaviour, quality of life and evaluation of emotional status were assessed. Changes in HbA1c were used as a parameter of glycaemic control. At follow-up there was a significant decrease in HbA1c of 0.4% (p<0.01). However, this was not in statistically significant correlation with age, gender, aspects of quality of life or coping behaviour. Therefore, glycaemic control and/or improvement of glycaemic control in adolescents or young adults with Type 1 diabetes mellitus seems to be primarily related to other factors, eg continuous education provided in a stable setting.

Determination of future health status expectation in rheumatoid arthritis.

While examining the relationship between, neuroticism, somatic factors and future health status expectation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, the present study found a considerable level of pessimism in patients, which may be related to perceived limitation of the quality of life. However, psychosocial disposition (i.e., neuroticism) did not prove to be a crucial factor by which RA patients assessed their future health status expectation. These results may be important in future treatment procedures.

Relationship between self-rated functional status and psychosocial stress in patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: To assess relationship between psychosocial factors and self-rated functioning in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In 66 RA patients (mean age +/- SD = 50.8 +/- 12.6 years, women 49 (74%), illness duration mean +/- SD = 13.4 +/- 10.5 years) aspects of developmental psychosocial stress thought to influence human behavior were assessed in an in depth interview using structured biographical history. Furthermore evaluation included Trait anxiety, global functional status according to the ACR criteria, radiological staging of illness and patients' self-ratings of functioning obtained by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ). Bivariate correlations were performed using psychosocial and somatic factors and self-rated functional status. RESULTS: Scores of developmental psychosocial stress significantly correlated with interviewers scoring of nurture (r = -0.722, p < 0.001) indicating good internal consistency of interview data. Significant correlations were found between patients' scoring of functional status (HAQ) and (i) ACR criteria (r = 0.490, p < 0.0001) and (ii) score of Trait anxiety (r = 0.367, p < 0.003). There was no significant correlation between developmental psychosocial stress and HAQ score. CONCLUSION: Developmental psychosocial stress does not significantly contribute as to how RA patients perceive their functional ability. In a proportion of RA patients self-rated functional status may depend on the patients disposition (e.g. neuroticism) probably promoting impaired illness behavior (e.g. regressive tendencies) which should be considered in assessing treatment procedures.

Experience of pain in rheumatoid arthritis--an empirical evaluation of the contribution of developmental psychosocial stress.

Using a structured biographical history we evaluated the relationship between aspects of development and reports of pain experience (i.e. intensity of pain, affective and affective-evaluative dimensions of pain according to the McGill pain questionnaire, and effectiveness of medication) in 66 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. It was postulated that higher loading with regard to developmental stress would have a negative influence on reports of pain experience. Multiple regression analysis showed that (i) the intensity of pain was significantly correlated with the functional stage of the illness, (ii) affective and affective-evaluative dimensions of pain experience correlated with the interviewer's scoring of nurture and the patient's relationship with his or her partner, and (iii) the effectiveness of medication was significantly associated with the partner's understanding of the patient's pain and duration of illness. However, independent variables could explain only part of the variance (i.e. 12% for pain intensity, 17% for affective and affective-evaluative dimensions of pain experience and 26% for the effectiveness of medication). These results suggest that the previously assumed importance of developmental psychosocial stress as a factor in chronic intractable pain may require careful reassessment.